ABOUT US

Develop the most comfortable personal protective equipment that workers love to wear – a brand synonymous with comfort, performance and consistent quality.

At EISEN, we love to engage and support end users with their hand protection and technical clothing requirements. We do this through working with distribution partners to help them best serve their customers, offering technical support, guidance and business development support. We’d love to partner with you to support your business and your customers with the best hand protection and technical clothing available. We look forward to hearing from you.

Reliable – consistent performance and quality Innovative – perpetually creative Trustworthy – honest and equitable Expeditious – rapid and efficient execution

Be the manufacturer of choice of all PPE wearers in Europe and North America

Making work comfortable. Creating comfortable protection is our obsession. Our singular focus, our all-consuming passion is to keep workers protected – comfortably. Many manufacturers can produce protective PPE. Many manufacturers can meet or exceed mandatory product testing requirements. Very rarely can manufacturers perfect the design, combine the very best fibres, yarns, components and coatings to create truly comfortable PPE – exceptional products that wearers love to wear. The development of every EISEN product follows the same exhaustive EISEN ProteQ design and creative process, ensuring the final product is perfectly suited to its original application. We’re never satisfied with mediocrity; we want hard workers to enjoy wearing our products. Our product development cycle is a perpetual process, never satisfied with our progress and innovation to date. Enthusiasm for pushing the barriers of the achievable combined with a curiosity to seek out powerful new yarn and coating combinations ensures the EISEN journey of innovation never terminates. And we never stop enjoying it. There’s always something exciting on the horizon. Wearer Input Always great place to start. To understand what works and what doesn’t work. What could function better? What’s uncomfortable and hinders productivity? Protection Understand what harm could await our wearers. What life-changing incident could overcome them? What protection is actually needed? Durability What causes premature product failure? How could the current provision perform better for longer? Why does performance decline? Design Focus on comfort. Using EISEN excellence in product design, how do we make the product as comfortable as possible? Can we engineer out weaknesses and vulnerable areas? Materials Enhance the performance. Can we combine our special components, coatings and fabrics to create enhanced performance and extended lifecycle? Benchmark Set the standard. Aim higher and focus on making comfortable, productive EISEN wearers. Prototypes Trial the solution. Using our unique design and range of components, create solutions for wearers to trial. Optimise More comfort and protection. Refine the design to ensure the most comfortable and protective product possible. Test Test to destruction. Not minimum testing, but independent testing to ensure we outperform all other options currently available. Certify Test and certify. to all required standards. Train Instruct users. Train wearers in the correct usage and care of the product. Understand its capabilities and applications Feedback Engage with users. Identify further opportunities for future product refinement.

Representing the pinnacle in safety performance, skin care and comfort, EISEN NBX technology represents a quantum leap forward in glove coatings. Not only does EISEN NBX dramatically extend the life of the glove, it’s great for your skin and totally breathable, ensuring your hands don’t perspirate during a hard day’s work. Super abrasion resistance for increased durability The EISEN NBX coating is based on a unique dual coating process to ensure the outer coating achieves maximum adhesion. As a result, an incredible level of abrasion resistant is achieved – the highest available. Combined with thumb crotch reinforcement to protect the most vulnerable area of the glove, products with this coating will be kind to your skin and the environment No DMF and no harmful substances are used in the EISEN NBX coating. Always kind to your skin and great for the environment, using EISEN NBX gloves will dramatically reduce your waste costs and positively decrease your environmental impact. Total breathability and super flexible for great comfort Breathability in every direction and totally flexible, the EISEN NBX coating is wonderfully comfortable for all-day heavy wear – even in warm, humid conditions. The coating never ceases to breathe and never loses its tactility and dexterity. Serious gripping power The EISEN NBX coating provide exceptional grip in dry and slightly oily conditions, based on a smooth surface which acts in a suction effect when gripping slippery components. Silicone free for reduced contamination Ideal for aerospace, glass processing, automotive and a multitude of applications, the EISEN NBX is silicone free, eliminating potentially expensive silicone contamination. Gloves with NBX coating The following glove references have NBX coating as standard: EW2680, EW3480, EW2385.

The EISEN Protection Indicator is a unique intuitive glove selection system, specially designed to help eliminate incorrect glove selection, enabling the wearer to choose the correct risk-based protection. Glove ratings are comparatively complex to understand if wearing a pair of gloves is just a minor necessity of doing your job. It is unlikely that one-off training through toolbox talks and other teaching methods will result in the understanding being retained long term. This lack of knowledge can result in increased injuries from poor glove selection – possibly chosen for dexterity or comfort rather than offering sufficient protection. Correct glove selection made easy Whilst nearly all gloves may be marked correctly, very few wearers have any idea what most of the markings relate to – even the most critical ones. The EISEN Protection Indicator is the most straightforward, easy-to-use system available. Easy to understand glove safety performance. Wearers using the EISEN Protection Indicator system are far more likely to select the correct fit-for-purpose glove based on the easy-to-understand information on the glove. Highlighting just the cut or heat protection level or using a different colour liner is a start, but it doesn’t provide context to the protection rating. Consequently, wearers often fail to understand the level of protection they are wearing despite the best efforts of hand protection manufacturers to assist. Fortunately, the EISEN Protection Indicator system addresses this in the simplest way possible – removing the confusion of standalone ratings Reduce injuries through correct glove selection Feedback from end users confirms that one of the frequent issues in hand injuries is the wearer selecting inappropriate protection. The user thought they were wearing cut or thermal protective gloves but had no idea what level of protection they provided. The EISEN Protection Indicator has been developed especially as a solution to this issue. Visual and written safety standards The intuitive EISEN Protection Indicator allows the wearer to easily identify the glove’s protective performance in both visual and written forms unlike other identification systems which do not indicate the spectrum of protection available or identify the specific thermal protection levels. Multi-Lingual Guidance in 5 Languages The system is translated into German and French on the glove itself and additionally Italian and Polish on the EISEN glove wrap, with the brief intuitive system guidance available in 5 languages.

The new EISEN glove wrap is a unique combination of easy-to-read safety guidance, multi-lingual instructions and an environmentally friendly packaging solution. Easy to understand safety guidance The uniquely easy-to-understand EISEN Protection Indicator system is included on the wrap to ensure wearers can quickly identify the safety performance of the glove provided. 10 language multi-lingual user instructions The user instructions are translated into German, French, Italian, Polish, Russian, Spanish, Dutch, Danish and Swedish ensuring the vast majority of the workforce can understand the guidance provided. The Environment Wins Fully recyclable, the unique EISEN Glove Wrap system eliminates plastic bags using an environmentally friendly cardboard wrap. Importance Of Silicone Free Hand Protection Silicone contamination is a major factor in poor quality bonding and coatings, reckoned to be responsible for causing approximately 80% of craters – a well-recognised coating defect. This is primarily caused by a local surface wetting issue caused by reduced surface tension. As a highly effective lubricant and release agent, silicone is present in many manufacturing processes, with a tendency to spread through a manufacturing facility either through physical contact or possibly by air stream. With very low surface energy, silicones wet most surfaces very well preventing other coatings, adhesives or sealants from securely bonding to a contaminated surface. It has been estimated that over a third of bonding issues in an aerospace manufacturing facility are directly caused by silicone contamination. Poor coating finishes and bonding can lead to highly expensive reworking and cleaning or potentially scrapping affected production. Being relatively chemically inert, silicones are extremely difficult to remove in totality with a residue likely to remain, even after extensive cleaning. The safest option is to select silicone-free materials and PPE. Gloves are a common source of silicone, potentially introducing extensive silicone contamination into the manufacturing process. EISEN is the first glove manufacturer to launch a full range of silicone free hand protection. There is no longer any need to compromise on comfort, safety or performance when specifying silicone free hand protection for your workforce.

The EISEN DRI365 waterproof protection system is based on a best-in-class membrane and seam sealing combination. What is the benefit of EISEN DRI365? EISEN DRI365 waterproof garments outperform virtually every foul weather protective clothing available – not just initially, but after extended wear and washing. EISEN DRI365 are designed to be worn all year round, utilising a multi-layer system enabling the garments to be worn in both cold and mild weather. Why is EISEN DRI365 so special? Not only does EISEN DRI365 provide exceptional waterproofness and breathability, it maintains the performance, even after multiple wash cycles. Many fabrics will produce excellent waterproof performance initially, but rapidly deteriorate resulting in poor foul weather protection after a short period of use. Secondly, EISEN DRI365 high specification seam sealing provides outstanding liquid holdout where most waterproof garments quickly fail. Why is seam sealing so critical? The seams are the most vulnerable part of waterproof clothing and the most likely to leak. The EISEN DRI365 waterproof protection is based on the very best seam sealing components and manufacturing practice, ensuing all waterproof EISEN garments offer guaranteed rain holdout even after 50 washes. What should I look for when selecting waterproof garments? By EISEN standards, waterproof garments should continue to holdout the elements and breathe effectively, even after repeated wear and washing. This is based on fabrics and seams performing consistently over the lifetime of the garment. As a general rule, many manufacturers will advertise the initial waterproof performance of the fabrics. Very few will advertise the performance of the fabric after washing or the seam performance which is the most difficult waterproof measurement to achieve. Always look for guarantees of seam waterproofness after washing. The absence of any guarantee probably indicates limited waterproof durability. What’s different about EISEN DRI365 compared to other waterproof fabrics? Put simply, it’s the ongoing guaranteed waterproof performance and exceptional breathability. At EISEN, we are a centre of design and manufacturing excellence, spending months and years developing and perfecting the very best solutions to recurring wearer issues – leaking, clammy, foul weather clothing. How do you guarantee EISEN DRI365 waterproof garments will continue to stay waterproof? All EISEN designs have been extensively tested by independent test laboratories – well in excess of the test requirements of EN 343 Waterproof and Breathable Protective Clothing standard. We have our own inhouse test equipment, enabling us to test each production to ensure all garments meet the stringent EISEN DRI365 requirements. How does EISEN DRI365 performance compare to other manufacturers? At EISEN, we have extensively tested other garments on the market to benchmark our own developments. The results below provide a comparison of EISEN DRI365 against our typical garments, including after repeated washing. How does EISEN DRI365 work so efficiently? EISEN DRI365 membranes perform in both high and low temperatures, providing protection for wearers against extreme environmental conditions that they may be exposed to during their work. EISEN DRI365 breathable membranes allow for sweat to pass through to the outer fabrics, to enable more efficient regulation of body temperature, allowing wearers to stay more comfortable for longer. The membranes’ waterproof nature prevents water from impregnating the base layers, providing protection for users in the coldest and wettest of conditions. The breathable and waterproof technology of EISEN DRI365 membranes are also combined with lightweight and comfortable fabrics to provide a solution that is highly effective in a wide range of demanding environments.

This is a frequently asked question. Which is the most suitable flame retardancy type – inherent or coated? It depends on the application and user preference. Inherent fabrics have the advantage of lifelong flame retardant characteristics – these never wash out. Coated fabrics have advanced in technology in recent years to provide extremely durable protection with some available that are guaranteed to provide flame retardant protection for over 100 washes. What is the difference between inherent and coated fabrics? Both options have flame resistance engineered into them. Inherent fabrics are manufactured using fibres where the flame-retardant properties are inherently present in the fibre’s polymer structure thereby creating an innately flame-retardant fabric. Its flame-retardant properties are not subject to degradation through laundering. Conversely, coated fabrics may have fibres that have been chemically treated to achieve FR properties or subjected to a chemical application process after weaving, endowing the fabric with flame retardant properties for the useful life of the garment. The first treated fabric was launched in 1987. The gap in effectiveness between the two methods has been shrinking ever since. What are the advantages of inherent fabrics? Very simply, the protective characteristics never wash out; they remain for the lifetime of the fabric. Great for highly durable garments when you have no method of counting wash cycles and you want the assurance of guaranteed protection regardless of how long the garment remains in service. What are the advantages of coated fabrics? Like all fabrics, coated fabrics are available in a wide spectrum of qualities. Provided they are washed according to the instructions, EISEN coated fabrics (EX**** and EX***) are guaranteed for 120 washes, exceeding the useful lifetime of the garment. Secondly, polycotton is stronger and significantly more colourfast than almost all modacrylic blends. As a result, coated garments will generally look superior after repeated washing, especially industrial laundry which is in general is significantly more demanding on fabrics, leading to a quicker loss of colour and shape. What fabric should I choose for hi-visibility workwear garments? All hi-visibility garments certified to EN ISO 20471 will include certified reflective tape, applied by sewing or thermal heat transfer. All these tapes will include a maximum number of wash cycles they have been tested and certified to – often only 25 washes, but sometimes more. Consequently, the garment can only be laundered 25 times regardless of whether it is made from inherent or coated fabric. EISEN reflective tapes are certified to a minimum of 60 domestic washes or 50 industrial washes (dependent on product) – both representing half the laundry lifetime of the fabric. Primarily, the decision to use coated or inherent hi-visibility garments rests on the performance and comfort of the fabric, but we can safely recommend either option from the EISEN range for flame retardant hi-visibility workwear garments knowing that they will remain flame retardant for the useful lifetime of the garment.

IEC 61482-2: 2018 Certified and approved garments protect against the thermal hazards associated with electric arcs. Open Arc test and Box test. When there is a risk of being exposed to an electric arc e.g. when servicing equipment in non-arc-safe distribution plants or electrical switchboards, or when working on high voltage equipment, personnel are recommended to wear arc-approved protective clothing. What protection does your clothing need to provide during an arc blast? The plasma clouds, flames, radiation and metal splashes from the electrodes hit the fabric during an arc blast. When this occurs, the garment must provide enough insulation to prevent second-degree skin burns. An effective fabric used in an arc garment must provide protection against the flame and metal splashes, in addition to insulation from the intense heat. The relevant standard, IEC 61482-2, includes two test methods, IEC 61482-1-1 (open arc) and IEC 61482-1-2 (box test). Garments must be worn that cover the whole body. For example, jacket and trousers must be worn together with other personal protective equipment (PPE), including a helmet with protective visor, protective gloves and protective footwear (boots) to achieve the correct level of protection. Wearing multiple layers of garments is very important and will increase protection, all of which must be flame retardant. Arc Test IEC/EN 61482-1-1:2019 – Open Arc Test - Determination of the arc rating (ELIM, ATPV and/or EBT) of clothing materials and of protective clothing using an open arc ATPV, EBT and ELIM are all evaluated using the same test, an open arc test (EN 61482-1-1/ASTM F1959). If the material has more thermal insulation value than arc tensile strength in resistance to heat, then it will break open first. If the opposite is true, the material will allow burns before it breaks open. The lowest of these values is the one that is used in the marking of the garments. ATPV (Arc Thermal Performance Value) This is the incident energy on a material that results in a 50% probability that enough heat transfer through the specimen is predicted to cause the onset of second-degree burn injury based on the Stoll Curve. The higher the value, the better the protection. EBT (Energy Breakopen Threshold) This is the incident energy on a material that results in a 50% probability of breakopen. Breakopen is defined as any open area at least 1.6 cm². The higher the value, the better the protection. ATPV, EBT and ELIM can be tested on single or multiple layers of material. When multiple layers are tested, a higher value will be achieved than if the fabrics were tested separately because air trapped between the fabrics also has an additional insulating and protective effect. HAF (Heat Attenuation Factor) HAF is the measurement of the percentage of energy that is blocked by the material or material system. ELIM (Incident Energy Limit) ELIM complements the ATPV and EBT values for Open Arc test, indicating the energy level that the garment can be exposed to with a 0% probability of second-degree burns. ATPV measures the energy level at which there is a 50% probability of second-degree burns. ELIM will be introduced on material combinations which has been tested with multiple layers during a transitional period. Garments which are tested against open arc shall achieve at least an ELIM value ≥3,2 cal/cm², where ATPV or EBT value shall achieve at least ≥4 cal/cm². Arc Test IEC/EN 61482-1-2:2014 – Box Test - Determination of arc protection class of material and clothing by using a constrained and directed arc (box test) The garments are tested and evaluated in two classes in the same test; a box test. (Voltage: 400 V, Duration: 500 ms, Frequency: 50 Hz or 60 Hz). All electric arc protective garments are certified according to:IEC 61482-2:2009 The EBT or ATPV value IEC 61482-2:2018 The ATPV or ELIM value, or a combination of both IEC 61482-2:2018 Arc Protection Class 1 = 4 kA, arc energy 168 kJ Arc Protection Class 2 = 7 kA, arc energy 320 kJ EN ISO 11611:2015 Protective clothing for use in welding and allied processes There is a risk of exposure of skin to Ultraviolet (UV) radiation during electric arc-welding operations. During use the fabric of the clothing will degrade. Examine the garments regularly to prevent exposure to UV radiation. If user experience sunburn-like symptoms, UVB is penetrating. If garment is found to be penetrated by UV radiation, it should be repaired (if practicable) or replaced and the use of additional, more resistant protective layers should be considered in future. Two-piece protective clothing must be worn together to provide the specified level of protection. The guidance label inside the garment will state the required garment configuration. Using additional partial protective garments, the basic garment shall meet at least Class 1. Use of a welding apron which covers the width of the front body is recommended. Additional partial body protection may be required, e.g. for welding overhead. Within this EN Norm is a series of tests - the most important of which are described in ISO 6942, ISO 9150, ISO 15025 and EN 1149-2. ISO 11611 has two classes - if the arc fabric passes all the tests, it is designated as Class 1 and if the fabric receives a Class 2 rating for the ISO 6942 and ISO 9150 tests, it is designated as Class 2. Class 1 – Lower Hazard Welding Application Class 2 – Higher Hazard Welding Applications ISO 6942 This is a test method for assessing fabrics and fabric combinations exposed to radiant heat. In this test, a fabric sample is exposed to radiant heat (infrared rays). The temperature on the reverse (unexposed) side of the sample is registered using a calorimeter. Subsequently, the length of time the sample the sample can remain exposed before its temperature rises by 24°C is measured. This test is also used for EN 531C and has two different classes as follows: Class 1 temperature increase occurs after ≥ 7 second Class 2 temperature increase occurs after ≥ 16 seconds. ISO 9150 Determining the behaviour of fabrics when exposed to small spatters of molten metal. In this test, droplets of molten metal are spattered on a vertically suspended fabric sample. The number of droplets it takes to cause an increase in temperature of 40°C on the reverse side of the sample is determined. This test also has two classes as follows: Class 1 ≥ 15 droplets of molten metal Class 2 ≥ 25 droplets of molten metal ISO 15025 Test method for limited flame spread. The test consists of applying a flame to a fabric sample for 10 seconds. To pass the test, the after flame & smoulder times and formation of holes must be within the tolerances (set in the standard). This test is also used for EN 531A. The application of a flame can take place in two ways: Procedure A (leads to Class A1): the flame is applied horizontally (similarly to EN 470 and EN 531) Procedure B (leads to Class A2): the flame is applied laterally EN 1149-2 This is a test method for measuring the electrical resistance of a fabric sample and determining whether an electrical charge passes through the sample from the outside to the inside. For further information on this EN Norm please refer to the EN1149 section. EN ISO 11612:2015 Clothing to protect against heat and flame The requirements of this standard apply to clothing intended for a wide range of applications which offer limited flame spread and provide protection against various hazards including Radiant Heat, Convective Heat and splatters of Molten Metal. There are several fabric tests within this EN Norma and the results of the tests are represented by the pre-fix letters A, B, C, D, E and F. A number after these letters indicates the performance of the fabric within this test. If a (0) is shown, then the fabric has not been tested or does not achieve the lowest value attainable with the test. A: Limited flame spread A1: Surface ignition EN ISO 15025:2000 Procedure A (leads to Class A1), the flame is applied horizontally (similarly to EN470 and EN531) • No specimen shall give flaming to the top or either side edge • No specimen shall give hole formation • No specimen shall give flaming or molten debris • The mean value of afterflame time shall be ≤ 2s • The mean value of afterglow time shall be ≤ 2s A2: Edge ignition Procedure B (leads to Class A2), the flame is applied laterally. • No specimen shall give flaming to the top or either side edge • No specimen shall give flaming or molten debris • The mean value of after flame time shall be ≤ 2s • The mean value of afterglow time shall be ≤ 2s B: Protection against convective heat Convective heat is the heat transmitted through the garment when exposed to flames. If there is an outer fabric that does not burn, injury may nevertheless occur due to the heat that forms when the fabric – and, indirectly, the body – comes in contact with the flame. The length of time the sample can remain exposed before its temperature rises by 24 °C is determined. B1: 4 < 10 seconds B2: 10 < 20 seconds B3: 21 seconds and longer C: Protection against radiant heat Low radiant heat over a long period can result in a risk of injury. In this test, a fabric sample is exposed to radiant heat (infrared rays). The temperature on the reverse (unexposed) side of the sample is registered using a calorimeter. Subsequently, the length of time the sample the sample can remain exposed before its temperature rises by 24°C is measured. The test procedure is the same as ISO 11611, but the classification is different: C1: 7 < 20 seconds C2: 20 < 50 seconds C3: 50 < 95 seconds C4: 95 seconds and longer D: Protection against molten aluminium splash E: Protection against molten iron splash Even if the fabric does not start to burn or decay in contact with the molten metal, you may still get burns. The test indicates how many molten metal splashes the fabric can withstand before protection is compromised. A membrane (with similar properties to human skin) is attached to the reverse of the fabric sample sequentially rising quantities of molten metal (Aluminium or Iron as applicable) are splashed on the sample. The quantity of molten metal which deforms the membrane is determined. The classification for molten aluminium is: D1: 100 < 200 grams D2: 200 <350 grams D3: 350 grams and more The classification for molten iron is: E1: 60 < 120 grams E2: 120 < 200 grams E3: 200 grams and more F: Protection against contact heat Contact heat over a long period can result in risk of injury. This test establishes a value for contact heat. The classification is determined as follows: F1: 5 < 10 seconds F2: 10 < 15 seconds F3: 15 seconds and longer EN ISO 14116:2015 Protective clothing – Protection against flame – Limited flame spread material, material assemblies and clothing Protective clothing complying with this standard is intended to protect the user against occasional and brief contact with small igniting flames, in circumstances where there is no significant heat hazard and without the presence of another type of heat. Clothing manufactured to this standard is made from flame retardant fabric so that if the material comes into contact with a flame, it will only continue to burn for a limited amount of time. If single layer garment contains index 1 materials, those must be worn over index 2 or 3 garments, and may not come in contact with the skin. The standard is mostly used for approval of lining and trims for use in EN ISO 11612-garments. Can also be used for garments that cannot be EN ISO 11612 certified. When protection against heat hazards is necessary, EN ISO 11612 is recommended. Protective clothing according to EN ISO 14116 may consist of several separate garments, or a single garment with one or more layers. All assemblies claiming compliance with this standard shall achieve a limited flame spread index of 1, 2 or 3 when tested in accordance with ISO 15025. Index 1: No flaming to the top or side edge, no flaming debris and no afterglow shall spread from the carbonized area to the undamaged area. Hole formation is possible under this Index. These fabrics should not be worn next to the skin. An example of a fabric in the category would be an FR polyester which will meet the requirements but will always form a hole. Index 2: No flaming to the top or side edge, no flaming debris and no afterglow shall spread from the carbonized area to the undamaged area. No hole formation possible with this Index. The requirements are the same as Index 3 but no maximum afterflame time is specified. Index 3: Requirements are the same as Index 2, but the afterflame time of each individual specimen should not exceed 2 seconds. EN ISO 20471:2013 Certified and approved garments for protection when the user needs visually to signal his or her presence to vehicles in daylight, at night or in poor weather conditions. The standard covers the requirements for the base fabric colour, minimum areas for reflectivity and placement of tape for high-visibility clothing. Three colours of material are approved in the hi-vis standards; fluorescent yellow, orange and red. The standard pictogram for this standard is a safety vest in proximity to two numbers – the X and Y values. The top X value indicates the class of the garment from 1 to 3, 3 being the most visible. The Y value of the standard is determined by the quality of the reflective strip in the safety garment, and the value is shown as either 1 or 2. The requirement for the fluorescent textile is that it must retain its fluorescent properties also after a certain number of washing cycles. For the textile in contrasting colour, there is a requirement for colour fastness. For the reflective material, there is a requirement that it must retain its reflective properties also after washing. The table shows the minimum area per garment for fluorescent textile and reflective material, measured in m². Class 1 Fluorescent material: 0.14 Reflective material: 0.10 Not suitable for working on public highways Class 2 Fluorescent material: 0.50 Reflective material: 0.13 For roadwork with traffic travelling at a maximum speed of 50 km/hour Class 3 Fluorescent material: 0.80 Reflective material: 0.20 For roadwork with traffic travelling at higher permissible speeds Design Requirements The fluorescent fabric must encircle the torso, sleeves and trouser legs. And the difference in surface area between the front and back may be a maximum of 40% – 60%. The reflective strip must be 50 mm wide and the space between 2 reflective strips must be at least 50 mm. The distance from ‘the end’ of the garment (e.g. the end of a trouser leg) to the reflective strip must also be at least 50mm. Garment Combination Several garments can be certified together as a combination, such as jacket and trousers, to achieve a higher class. EN 342:2004 Certified and approved garments provide protection against cold weather A cold climate is characterised by a combination of moisture and a temperature below -5°. EN 342 indicates the value of the resulting effective thermal insulation for a wearer. It indicates the lowest temperature at which the body can maintain thermal neutral conditions indefinitely (8 hours) for light and medium duty tasks. It also indicates the lowest temperature at which body cooling is sustained at an acceptable level for 1 hour, while the wearer is performing light and medium duty tasks. Two-piece protective clothing should be used together to achieve the specified level of protection. The CE label in the garment provides information about the necessary garment combination. a: Resulting thermal insulation measured with underwear of type B (moving mannequin) b: Resulting thermal insulation measured with underwear of type B (static mannequin) c: Air permeability (Levels 1–3) d: Resistance to water penetration (optional) EN 1149-5:2008 Certified and approved garments that protect against electrostatic discharge This standard covers protective clothing against electrostatic charge for use in areas where there is an explosion hazard. Design Requirements The clothing must completely cover any textile that does not provide antistatic protection. Accessories, such as markers, labels and reflectors, must be permanently attached to the garment, in such a way that they cannot be separated from the garment. Loose parts are not permitted. Accessories that can conduct electricity, such as zips and metal buttons, are only permitted if they are completely covered by the antistatic outer layer. Textile Requirements The textile of the outer layer must be tested and approved according to one of the following standards: EN 1149-1 or EN 1149-3. The distance between the conductive threads in the textile must not exceed 10 mm. User Information When wearing garments with electrostatic properties, they must be properly earthed. Resistance between the wearer and earth must be less than 108 Ω, which is achieved e.g. by using appropriate protective footwear such as shoes with electrostatic properties that meet the requirements of EN ISO 20345: 2011 or EN ISO 20344. Protective clothing with electrostatic properties must not be opened or removed in combustible or explosive environments or when handling combustible or explosive substances. Garments should only be used in areas with increased oxygen content following approval from the authorised safety engineer at the workplace. The antistatic properties of the garment may be affected by wear, washing and contaminants. Materials that are not approved according to the standard must be covered by protective clothing during normal use (including bending and movements). EN 13034:2005 TYPE PB* [6] Protective clothing offering limited protective performance against liquid chemicals Standard for protective clothing that provides limited protection against liquid chemicals. Suitable for work in environments where there may be a risk of chemical splashes, but where a total chemical barrier is not required. The standard has two classes: Type 6 clothing has been tested as a full suit. Type PB[6] (Partial Body Protection) has not been tested as a full suit Design Requirements Seams must prevent fluid from penetrating through stitches or through other seam components, and ensure that fluid runs off. There must be no folds/pleats/pockets or similar, where chemicals may accumulate. Textile Requirements The fabric is tested in various ways to determine its tensile strength and resistance to chemicals. In these tests, four different solutions of chemicals are applied to a fabric sample and the quantities of liquid that drip off and penetrate the fabric are measured and analysed, and must be within the tolerances set within the standard. The following four chemicals are tested in accordance with EN 14325: Sulphuric acid H2SO4, 30%. Sodium hydroxide NaOH 10%. O-xylene undiluted. 1-butanol undiluted User Information Prior to use, the garment must be checked to make sure it is intact, that it fits and that the wearer knows how it is opened and removed. Two-piece protective clothing should certified together as a ‘set’ and used together to achieve the specified level of protection. If chemicals are splashed onto the garment, the wearer should immediately move away from the area, carefully remove the garment, ensuring that no chemicals or liquid come into contact with the skin. The garment must then be washed/cleaned, and then treated according to the washing instructions and assessed for future use. If this is not possible, the garment should be taken out of use. EN 343:2019 Certified and approved garments provide protection against rain and inclement weather This standard specifies the requirements and test methods for fabrics and seams of clothing offering protection against precipitation (rain, falling snow), fog and ground humidity. Resistance to water penetration and water vapour resistance are measured. Footwear, gloves and separate headwear are excluded from the scope of this standard. The X value indicates the waterproofing of the article. The Y value indicates the breathability of the fabric(s). Water Penetration Mandatory testing class 1 Textile before pre-treatment: Wp ≥ 8,000 Pa (815mm) Textile after each pre-treatment: Testing not required Seams before pre-treatment : Wp ≥ 8,000 Pa (815mm) Mandatory testing class 2 Textile before pre-treatment: Testing not required Textile after each pre-treatment: Wp ≥ 8,000 Pa (816mm) Seams before pre-treatment : Wp ≥ 8,000 Pa (816mm) Mandatory testing class 3 Textile before pre-treatment: Testing not required Textile after each pre-treatment: Wp ≥ 13,000 Pa (1,325mm) Seams before pre-treatment : Wp ≥ 13,000 Pa (1,325mm) Mandatory testing class 4 Textile before pre-treatment: Testing not required Textile after each pre-treatment: Wp ≥ 20,000 Pa (2,039mm) Seams before pre-treatment : Testing not required Seams after pre-treatment : Wp ≥ 20,000 Pa (2,039mm) Breathability Recommended maximum continuous use based on ambient temperature at the workplace Class 1 Ret >40 25°C: 60 minutes 20°C: 75 minutes 15°C: 100 minutes 10°C: 240 minutes 5°C: - Class 2 Ret >25 - ≤40 25°C: 105 minutes 20°C: 250 minutes 15°C: - 10°C: - 5°C: - Class 3 Ret >15 - ≤25 25°C: 205 minutes 20°C: - 15°C: - 10°C: - 5°C: - Class 4 Ret ≤15 25°C: - 20°C: - 15°C: - 10°C: - 5°C: Design Requirements Taped seams must be waterproof and the textile must be tested for water penetration. There are no other requirements for the design of the garment. Textile Requirements Requirements for mechanical properties: Water permeability (Wp) EN 20811 and water vapour resistance (Ret) EN 31092 are listed above. Both Wp and Ret have been tested following repeated flexing and exposure to isooctane and straight-chain paraffins, according to ISO 1817. The tensile strength, tear resistance, shrinkage and seam strength must be within the tolerances specified in the standard. EN 13758-2 Protection against UV radiation Standard for the classification and marking of long sleeve garments that give the wearer UVA + UVB protection over 40UPF. All textiles offer protection for the wearer against the sun and risk of sun burn depending on the thickness of the fabric - this standard indicates that the protection is high. Test method for fabric is EN 13758-1.

Selecting the correct glove coating is critical to ensuring optimum grip, protection and dexterity. Different coatings will heavily influence the longevity of the glove more than any other factor, so it is well worth choosing your preferred coating carefully to maximise safety, comfort and durability. Developments in fibres and yarn construction in parallel with innovation in coating has led to enhanced longevity and dexterity – both highly coveted by users. The following information should enable you to narrow down your preferred options, but we always suggest trialling any potential solution to ensure it performs as expected. Durability The longevity of a knitted glove with an external coating is determined by two factors: The coating material – this will have the greatest influence as the primary area of wear The liner yarn and construction – utilising and modifying different yarn types and construction methods can strongly influence the bonding of the surface coating, making a substantial difference to the durability of the coating Grip Selecting gloves with sufficient grip is a significant factor in maximising productivity and minimising fatigue. Poor grip results in more energy expended handling components and raises potential safety issues from falling or dropped objects. Different coatings provide distinctly different grip performance depending on the liquid present, the size and weight of the object – and to a degree – the work environment. Liquid Repellency There is a major variation in liquid hold-out between the various coatings. As a general rule, the greater the liquid repellency, the more impervious the coating – and consequently greatly reduced breathability. Fully coated gloves are excellent for reducing liquid ingress, but they do not stretch like a palm coated glove and therefore are generally a smaller fit, and they the wearer will suffer from warm, clammy hands after prolonged use. It is important to note, that fully dipped gloves are not necessarily suitable for chemical handling. They must be certified to the relevant standard. Silicone Free Some coatings are silicone free, eliminating silicone contamination in critical applications in some aerospace and automotive manufacturing and other industries. It is worth checking that the glove liner is also silicone free to ensure silicone contamination is eliminated as far as possible. Coating Material The suitability of the glove coating will be a major factor in the comfort of the glove, the wearer’s productivity and its protective properties. ​ ​

When selecting protective gloves of a cut or heat resistant variety, always pay careful attention to the primary fibres mentioned in the yarn composition. Generally, these fibres will be providing the protection the glove has been designed and marketed for and will be the primary determinant of the safety performance. Why are protective fibres important? The protective fibres will generally provide the critical mechanical or thermal protection that you purchased the glove for. Why should I specify branded fibres? For assurance of consistent, reliable protection, the performance of branded quality proprietary fibres such as Kevlar, Tsunooga and Dyneema are unparalleled. Many glove manufacturers will use unbranded or own-branded fibres to reduce cost. The real danger of adopting this approach is potentially reduced quality control of arguably the most critical component of the glove and possible inconsistent performance - possibly jeopardising the safety of the wearer with unreliable protection. What are the benefits of using branded fibres? Aside from consistent quality, premium branded fibres offer unparalleled protection, dexterity and comfort. Generally, these fibres will provide higher protection-to-weight performance resulting in reduced bulk, increased dexterity and comfort combined with enhanced durability – leading to increased longevity, cost efficiency and reduced waste. What are the risks of using unbranded fibres? One of the core issues with using unbranded or own branded fibres is the lack of traceability; a change of fibre manufacturer may completely alter the comfort and dexterity of the glove and potentially the protective performance. Poor quality fibres will likely break easily resulting in coarse glove liners and increased likelihood of skin irritation. What are the primary branded fibres? Tsunooga: a very highly advanced Japanese ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) super fibre. Using Tsunooga in most advanced yarns results in a highly refined combination of cut resistance, dexterity, moisture control and fit. Put simply: guaranteed consistent performance with great wearer comfort. Dyneema: another very advanced ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) super fibre. Cool to wear, highly flexible, Dyneema offers a great solution for highly comfortable cut protection. Kevlar: with a wide range of inherent properties, Kevlar is available in a variety of fibre forms allowing blends with other fibres to maximise the protective characteristics of Kevlar. Offering inherent heat and cut resistance combined with resistance to oils and many chemicals, Kevlar is an excellent option where multiple protective properties are required. Which fibres should I use for cut protection? When protecting solely against cuts, UHMWPE super fibre is the best option – either Dyneema or Tsunooga. These can be combined with other materials e.g. glass fibre, steel or Tungsten to increase performance still further. Although Kevlar has a very similar tensile strength to the UHMWPE super fibres, Dyneema and Tsunooga benefit from much lighter density giving them a far higher strength-to-weight ratio. Coupled with this is the benefit that both Dyneema and Tsunooga do not trap air, allowing far more effective moisture wicking and cooler hands. Conversely, Kevlar lacks these qualities as well as a tendency to absorb moisture resulting in less breathable hand protection. Which fibres should I use for heat protection? Kevlar offers excellent heat protection up to 400°C whereas the melting point of UHMWPE super fibre is 135°C. Inherently flame retardant, Kevlar doesn’t melt, drip or support combustion making it an ideal fibre for use in heat resistant glove liners, including where cut resistance is required.

EN ISO 21420 General Requirements Previously EN ISO 420, this standard covers the general requirements for most types of protective gloves: Design and construction Protective gloves must not impair performance of the activity, while providing adequate protection from risk. Under this standard includes donning and doffing of protective gloves. During these actions, layers of reusable multi-layered gloves must not become separated, and the design of the gloves must minimise the time needed for donning and doffing. Sizing Sizing is defined based on the hand sizes that gloves are intended to fit. The sizes outlined under this standard cover the range of size 4 to size 13. The criteria assessed to determine sizing compliance include hand circumference and hand length (the distance from the wrist to the tip of the middle finger) Comfort and efficiency Glove dexterity is determined by multiple factors, including thickness of glove material and elasticity. When assessing glove dexterity, four gloves are tested. Dexterity is graded by the diameter of the smallest steel pin that can be picked up from a flat surface three times in 30 seconds. If no pin can be picked up, the level achieved is zero. If required, finger dexterity can be assessed for a specific use. Optional requirements for breathability and comfort are also included. Water vapour transmission for leather gloves is assessed in accordance with ISO 14268:2012 to a requirement of 5mg/cm2 per hour, and in accordance with ISO 11092:2014 to a requirement of 30m2 Pa/W for textile gloves. Water vapour absorption should be considered where the protection characteristics of the glove inhibit water vapour transmission. As an alternative, the gloves should be designed to reduce absorption of perspiration where possible. This is outlined in clause 5.3.2, which gives a requirement of 8mg/cm2 per hour for leather gloves when tested in accordance with ISO 20344:2011. Innocuousness Protective gloves must not adversely affect the health or hygiene of the wearer. The materials present in the gloves must not, under foreseeable conditions of normal use, release substances generally known to be toxic, toxic to reproduction, carcinogenic, mutagenic, allergenic, corrosive, sensitising or irritating. Requirements include: chromium VI – applicable to all leathers; less than 3mg/kg nickel release – applicable to metallic components in prolonged contact with skin; less than 0.5µg/cm2/week pH value – applicable to all materials; requirement: pH value is to be greater than 3.5 and less than 9.5. Each material must be tested separately azo colourants – applicable to all dyed leathers and textiles; requirement: less than 30mg/kg for each of the carcinogenic aromatic amines listed in the analysis methods dimethylformamide (DMFa) – applicable to all materials containing polyurethane (PU); less than 1,000mg/kg (1 per cent w/w) polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) – applicable to rubbers and plastics in direct contact with the skin; less than 1mg/kg of each of the eight restricted PAHs. EN ISO 388:2016 Protective Gloves Against Mechanical Risks This standard applies to gloves protecting against mechanical risks, including abrasion, cut, tear, puncture and impact. It includes four main physical tests to assess the resistance of the gloves palm area to abrasion, cutting, tearing and puncture. The performance of the glove is graded in accordance with four or five performance levels. The wearer is then able to select a glove with a performance level profile that suits a particular work activity. Abrasion Samples are cut from the palm of a glove and rubbed against a 180 grit abrasive paper using a Martindale type abrasion machine. The number of cycles for the samples to hole is measured. Four performance levels are defined in EN 388 shown in the table below. Blade Cut Samples are taken from the palm of a glove and the number of cycles to cut through the full thickness of the test sample by a blade is recorded. Blade sharpness will vary and is assessed by using the cut test machine to cut through a standard reference fabric. The cut resistance of the glove is based on a relative index that compares the number of cycles to cut through the glove when compared with the standard fabric. Five performance levels are defined in EN 388 shown in the table below. The Coupe test is based on the number of cycles required using a stainless steel circular blade under constant speed and a low force of 5 Newtons. For materials that dull the blade after 60 passes, it becomes mandatory to then test using the ISO 13997:1999 cut resistance method. Five performance levels are defined in EN 388 shown in the table below. The ISO 13997 is based on cutting through a sample using a rectangular blade. This allows the accurate calculation of the minimum force required to cut the sample material at a measured length of 20mm. This test is optional unless the blade in the Coupe Test becomes ‘dull’. If this occurs, the ISO cut test becomes the reference performance result. Six performance levels are defined in EN 388 shown in the table below. Tear ‘Trouser leg’ type samples are taken from the palm of a glove and are torn apart using a standard tensile test machine. Four performance levels are defined in EN 388 shown in the table below. Puncture Samples are taken from the palm of a glove and the force required to penetrate the sample with a defined stylus using a tensile test machine is measured.` Four performance levels are defined in EN 388 shown in the table below. Impact Protection Other than the fingers, each area where impact protection is claimed shall be tested for impact attenuation by measuring the peak transmitted force. To meet the requirements this force must be below a defined value. EN 407:2004 Protective Gloves Against Thermal Risks (heat and/or fire) A general standard designed to be used for any glove which is to be designed and sold as providing protection against thermal hazards. The standard includes six thermal tests: burning behaviour, contact heat, convective heat, radiant heat, small and large splashes of molten metal. EN 511:2006 Protective Gloves Against Cold A general standard designed to be used for any glove which claims protection against cold environments. The standard includes two specific tests for assessing thermal insulation: convective cold and contact cold plus other low temperature performance tests in addition to requirements from EN 388 and EN 21420. The glove's insulation properties may be affected by for example air temperature, humidity, wind speed, time of exposure, activity level, health and wellbeing of the user. If wet, the glove may lose its insulative properties. Gloves that pass the tests specified in this standard must also attain at least a performance level of 1 in the EN 388 abrasion and tear tests. If gloves attain less than a performance level of 2, then their resistance to both convective cold and contact cold must be reported as, maximum, level 1. Resistance to convective cold This is based on the glove's insulating properties, measuring the transfer of cold through convection. Four performance levels are defined in EN 511 shown in the table below Resistance to contact cold Based on the glove's thermal capacity when in contact with a cold object. Four performance levels are defined in EN 511 shown in the table below Permeability to water Measures a glove’s capacity to resist water penetration for 5 minutes. 0 indicates a fail and 1 a pass. X = Not Tested Explanation on levels of performance (Table relevant in ambient air temperature at a wind speed below 0,5 m/s.) EN ISO 374-1:2016 Protective Gloves Against Chemicals EN ISO 374-1: 2016 specifies performance criteria for gloves protecting against chemicals. It includes requirements for user information and product marking and references the following test procedures: EN 374-2:2014 Determination of resistance to penetration and EN 16523-1 Determination of resistance to permeation by liquid chemicals. To be certified as 'chemically protective' in accordance with EN ISO 374-1 and bear any of the conical flask pictograms, the gloves must first satisfy the requirements for resistance to penetration in EN 374-2:2014 clauses 7.2 and 7.3 (see below). Penetration is the movement of a chemical through an imperfection, such as a pinhole or other defect, and is a physical phenomenon where the liquid passes through the material on a non-molecular level. Penetration is evaluated by filling the glove separately with air and water, followed by an assessment to determine if there is any leakage. Under EN ISO 374-1:2016, gloves are classed as Type A, Type B or Type C depending on their performance level and number of chemicals they protect against. The table below lists the performance level and number of chemicals required for each type: There is a list of 18 test chemicals in EN ISO 374-1 (see table below), and a glove’s performance level against these chemicals defines the 'type' of chemical-resistant glove and, therefore, the pictogram used in glove marking: EN 374-2:2014 Resistance to Chemical Degradation This standard specifies a test method for the penetration resistance of gloves that protect against dangerous chemicals and/or micro-organisms (water leak and air leak test). Performance levels (AQL) for use in production control still included. As it is impractical in most cases to test every glove for possible pinholes a random sampling of gloves is carried out as defined by ISO 2859-1 to measure the statistical probability of defects in a particular batch of gloves. EN 16523-1:2015 Resistance To Chemical Permeation This standard replaces EN 374-3:2003 but employs a similar test method. Permeation is the process by which a chemical moves through a material at the molecular level. Sometimes, permeation occurs without any physical changes to the material (such as swelling, cracking or a reduction in its elasticity), so the material can seem unaffected, even though it does not provide adequate protection. The breakthrough time (time taken for the test chemical to pass through the glove) is measured, with 6 standard permeation performance levels as shown in the table below. The 3 test specimens for this test are taken from the palm area of glove. For gloves longer than 400mm and where the cuff is claimed to provide protection (or appears to offer protection) then a further 3 samples are tested from the cuff area. Additionally if the glove contains a joint or seam then this must also be tested. EN 374-4:2013 Resistance To Chemical Degradation Under EN ISO 374-1, the glove must be tested for this after exposure to every chemical shown on the user Instructions and glove markings. Degradation is a change in the material properties after exposure to the test chemical. Changes may be softening, hardening, swelling, thinning etc. and this is calculated by measuring the force needed to puncture the sample before and after exposure. These two results must be presented in the user instructions for every chemical tested but are not shown on the glove markings. EN 374-5:2016 Protection Against Micro-organisms Applicable to all gloves claiming micro-organisms protection; the test method is described in EN 374-2:2014, air-leak and water-leak. Gloves offering protection against viruses shall additionally pass a penetration test according to ISO 16604:2004 (method B). Determination of resistance of protective clothing materials to penetration by blood-borne pathogens. For gloves longer than 400 mm, and if the cuff is claimed to protect against micro-organisms risks additional test specimens shall be taken from the cuff area and tested to ISO 16604.